ZachXBT is accusing Garden Finance, a Bitcoin bridge, of laundering funds. – Knowledge Returns Alliance
 

ZachXBT is accusing Garden Finance, a Bitcoin bridge, of laundering funds.

July 16, 2026

A significant controversy is brewing within the cryptocurrency landscape, centering around Garden Finance, a platform promoting itself as “the fastest Bitcoin bridge.” Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has leveled serious allegations against Garden, accusing the company of facilitating the laundering of substantial sums of funds linked to prominent crypto heists, most notably the high-profile Bybit hack. These claims, detailed in a June 21 post on X, paint a disturbing picture of systemic manipulation and potential illicit activity, challenging the platform’s assertions of a secure and decentralized operation. ZachXBT’s core argument is that over 80% of Garden Finance’s recent fee revenue is derived from transactions allegedly connected to the notorious North Korean Lazarus Group, raising critical questions about the project’s due diligence and operational integrity.

The accusations stem from a series of posts made by Jaz Gulati, a co-founder of Garden Finance, who had recently highlighted the platform’s success, boasting of collecting 38.86 Bitcoin in fees – equating to $300,000 earned over the 12 days leading up to June 2. However, ZachXBT swiftly responded, pointing out that this figure deliberately omitted the substantial portion of revenue generated from what he characterized as “Chinese launderers” moving funds stemming from the Bybit hack. This revelation immediately cast doubt on Garden Finance’s claims of operating a transparent and reliable service, suggesting a conscious effort to conceal significant financial flows. ZachXBT’s argument hinges on the perception that Garden Finance was knowingly allowing itself to be used as a conduit for illicit activity, effectively undermining the trust that is paramount to any cryptocurrency operation.

Specifically, ZachXBT questioned the validity of Garden Finance’s decentralized model, pointing to the activity of a single individual continuously bolstering cbBTC liquidity from Coinbase. He observed this sustained activity in real-time over multiple days, arguing that this action directly fueled the flow of illicit funds while simultaneously contradicting Garden Finance’s branding as a trustless, decentralized system. This observation intensified the scrutiny surrounding the company’s operational practices and raised pointed questions about the veracity of its marketing claims. The user’s commentary highlighted a critical flaw in the project’s declared architecture, suggesting a lack of oversight and control over the movement of funds.

Garden Finance, through its founder Jaz Gulati, has vehemently denied these accusations, asserting that 30 BTC in fees were collected prior to the Bybit incident. Gulati dismissed the criticism as “misinformation,” labeling the claim of a “fake decentralized” model as baseless. He emphasized the project’s core value proposition: facilitating crosschain swaps within 30 seconds while ensuring zero-custody risk. Garden Finance’s Dune Analytics dashboard provides data on the platform’s operations, revealing over 24,984 BTC in total volume, equivalent to more than $1.5 billion, across 40,571 atomic swaps. The platform has collected 40.11 BTC in fees to date, with the largest single swap reaching 10 BTC. This information, however, does not negate the serious allegations surrounding the source of the revenue.

The situation is further complicated by the recent arrest of Iurii Gugnin, the founder of crypto payments firm Evita Pay, in New York. Gugnin faces 22 federal charges linked to a sprawling money laundering scheme allegedly involving over $530 million. According to the US Department of Justice, Gugnin facilitated stablecoin transactions that enabled clients connected to sanctioned Russian banks, such as Sberbank and VTB, to bypass restrictions and gain access to sensitive US technologies. This parallel case underscores the broader concerns surrounding the potential for cryptocurrency platforms to be exploited for illicit financial activities and highlights the growing regulatory scrutiny within the sector. The investigation, which has been ongoing since June 2023, and January 2025, has resulted in Gugnin being charged with wire fraud, money laundering, and operating an unlicensed money transmission business, with the potential for a life sentence if convicted.

These developments underscore a critical need for increased transparency and rigorous oversight within the cryptocurrency industry. The allegations against Garden Finance have ignited a debate about the responsibilities of blockchain service providers and the potential for systemic risks within the decentralized financial ecosystem. The ongoing scrutiny of figures like Iurii Gugnin emphasizes a growing awareness of the vulnerabilities and potential abuses inherent in this rapidly evolving technological landscape. The situation reflects a broader, more urgent discussion surrounding the need for effective regulation and proactive measures to safeguard investors and prevent the misuse of cryptocurrencies.